Analysts rebuilt mappings for each group review.
- ERP data exported
- Mappings rebuilt
- Definitions checked
- Questions sent back to divisions
Case study · Infrastructure products
An infrastructure products group now runs reviews from trusted data.
Carric connected separate divisional ERPs through a governed operating layer. Leaders compare products, inventory, orders, and performance while each source system remains authoritative.
- Client
- Multi-division infrastructure products group
- Operation
- Cross-division operating review
- Systems
- Divisional ERPs and reporting sources
- Decision owners
- Division leaders and data governance
The operating constraint
Leaders had one report. Each new question sent analysts back to the ERPs.
One of our clients is a multi-division infrastructure products group. Each business runs its day-to-day operation in a separate ERP. Those systems correctly reflect local products, units, customers, inventory, orders, and financial records.
Group leaders still need one view across the portfolio. Before Carric, every operating review required exports, mapping tables, spreadsheet adjustments, and conversations with division experts. The report could be consolidated, but its business meaning and source lineage were hard to inspect.
One governed layer now links the values while each ERP stays in control.
- Source records retained
- Mappings prepared
- Owners confirm meaning
- Group view refreshes with lineage
The working system
See what the system looks like.
Follow one product conflict through two role-specific views. The data steward sees what blocks the next group review. The divisional owner sees the source evidence and retains approval authority.
01 / 02
The data steward sees which conflicts could change the next group review.
The queue shows the affected record, consequence, owner, due date, evidence state, and current decision stage.
Swipe across the screen to inspect the full interface.
What changed operationally
Group reviews now use reconciled evidence, not rebuilt spreadsheets.
Leaders get a consistent cross-division view while local teams keep control of the systems that run their operations.
One trusted group view
Products, units, inventory, orders, customers, and measures become comparable across divisions.
Local ERPs stay in control
Each ERP still owns its transactions and local operating records.
Every value keeps its lineage
The group view carries the source, transformation, definition, owner, and approval state.
Downloadable case study
Get the full case study and operating blueprint.
The six-page PDF includes the old and new operating paths, the role of each system, both product views, and a checklist to find the same pattern in your group reporting.
- The reporting constraint and the conflict that exposed it
- The governed path from local records to a shared operating value
- Questions to assess a similar multi-ERP environment
A similar operating pattern
Which group review still sends your team back to the source data?
Bring one cross-division measure, the ERP records behind it, and the decisions it supports. Carric will help determine whether it is the right starting point.
Book a 30-minute fit call No formal brief is required.